Johnson v. M'Intosh
21 U.S. (8 Wheat. 543) (1823)

  • Johnson bought some land from a local Native American tribe (the Piankeshaw).
    • The land was in what would become Illinois, but at the time was not part of the US.
  • Later, after the US 'acquired' Illinois, M'Intosh obtained a deed (aka a land patent) for the same land from the US Federal government.
  • Johnson's heirs tried to get M'Intosh kicked off of their land (aka brought an action for ejectment).
  • The Trial Court found for M'Intosh. Johnson's heir appealed.
    • The Trial Court found that (from a legal standpoint) the Piankeshaw never actually owned the land, so there was no way they could have sold it to Johnson.
  • The US Supreme Court affirmed.
    • The US Supreme Court found that individuals such as Johnson could not buy land directly from Native Americans, since the US government had acquired ultimate title to Native American lands.
      • The Court found that the Native Americans never had legal title to the land, they only had a right of occupancy, which allowed them to live there.
    • The Court found that the Native Americans were just savages who didn't have the same perceptions of property rights as Europeans, so who cares what they think?
      • Plus, the Court found that the Native Americans weren't using the land effectively, so it was better for everybody if the US just took the land and 'civilized' it.
    • In part, the Court came to their decision on utilitarianism grounds. They agreed that it wasn't fair to the Native Americans, but they felt that if they recognized that the US didn't have clear title to land, it would be impossible for the Federal government to effectively govern.
  • This case defined the Discovery Doctrine.
    • The Discovery Doctrine consists of two key elements:
      • European nations assume free title to lands they 'discovered.'
        • This concept goes way back to Roman Law which essentially said 'to the victor goes the spoils'.
        • Native Americans on those lands, retained the right of occupancy (like tenants in an apartment building), but are not the "owners" of the land.
    • "Discovery is the foundation of title, in European nations, and this overlooks all proprietary rights in the natives."
      • The Native Americans are limited in their ability to sell their occupancy rights (aka a restriction on alienability).
        • So tribes could sell their limited rights of occupancy only to the discovering European nation. They can't sell it to private individuals.