In re Hargrove's Will
262 A.D. 202, 28 N.Y.S.2d 571, aff'd 288 N.Y. 604, 42 N.E.2d
608 (1942)
Hargrove wrote a will. The
will did not leave any $$$ for two of his children. Instead, it gave all
the money to his business associate's widow (Griscom).
Hargrove went through a
nasty divorce and believed that the children were not his.
Hargrove's divorce attorney
married his ex-wife a week after the divorce!
The wife testified that she
had been faithful and that the kids were Hargrove's.
Other than this belief,
there was nothing particularly delusional about Hargrove's behavior.
Hargrove had no contact with
his children for the next 31 years.
Hargrove died, and the
children contested the will.
The children argued that
Hargrove suffered from an insane delusion that the children were not his,
and therefore he lacked testamentary capacity to form a will.
The ten witnesses that
signed the will all testified that Hargrove was, "at all times of
sound mind and unusual intelligence."
The Trial Court found Hargrove
to be delusional and invalidated the will. Griscom appealed.
The Trial Court accepted as
a matter of law that the children were Hargrove's.
The Appellate Court reversed.
The Appellate Court found
that delusion was when someone
believed a fact even though there was no evidence to support the fact.
If there was some evidence
to support the fact, even if that evidence were not persuasive, then a
person believing that fact would not
be delusional, they'd just
be wrong.
The Appellate Court found
that, based on the evidence related to the divorce, it was conceivable
that the children were not his. Therefore, he was not delusional.
If there is a rational
basis then there is no delusion.
The Court pointed out that
there were not ruling on actual paternity, just on whether it was believable
that Hargrove was not the father.
In a dissent, it was argued
that Hargrove had once written an affidavit in another case where he
claimed that his wife had slept with hundreds of men, not just his ex
lawyer. That affidavit was evidence that Hargrove was not only
delusional, he lacked testamentary capacity.