Worldwide RV Sales & Service v. Brooks 534 N.E.2d 1132 (Ind.App. 3 Dist. 1989) Brooks bought a custom-built RV and specified in the contract that it must include two air conditioners. When he came to pick up the vehicle, it only had one, and that one was misplaced. He refused to accept delivery. Worldwide offered to add a second air conditioner, but this would leave a large hole in the roof of the RV. Brooks refused to accept the RV. Worldwide sued. Brooks argued that the offered merchandise wasn't what he specified, so he should not have to pay for it. Worldwide argued that they offered to fix the problem, and the RV would be substantially similar to what Brooks ordered, so he should have to accept it. The Court found for Brooks. The Court found that Brooks' refusal was proper under UCC §2-601 because the RV did not meet specifications, and that that Worldwide's offer to fix the vehicle did not meet the UCC §2-508 standard of making a conforming delivery. The Court noted that if Worldwide had offered to give Brooks a completely new RV, that would probably have met the UCC §2-508 standard.