National Dev. Co. v. Triad Holding Corp. 930 F.2d 253 (2d Cir. 1991) National was attempting to sue a guy named Khashoggi (owner of Triad). They attempted to serve him with papers at his mansion in New York, and his housekeeper accepted the papers. Khashoggi made a motion to dismiss the case for lack of service of process. Khashoggi argued that his real address was in Saudi Arabia and that he routinely moved between a number of houses worldwide. He only stayed in NYC for about about a month per year. Therefore, the NYC address was not his dwelling house or usual place of abode, and therefore under Federal Rule 60(b)(4), sending a summons there did not meet the minimum standard of service of process. The Trial Court denied the motion. Khashoggi appealed. The Trial Court found that the NYC address did not meet the minimum standard. However, the Court noted that regardless of how he got them, Khashoggi clearly now had the summons and therefore service of process had been satisfied. The Appellate Court affirmed, but for opposite reasons. The Appellate Court found that the Trial Court's assertion that Khasoggi now knew about the summons was insufficient. However, the Court found that under Federal Rule 4(d)(1) (now Federal Rule 4(e)(2)), that the NYC address did count as his dwelling, so service of process had been successful met. The Court found a person can have more than one dwelling or usual place of abode, so just because Khashoggi wasn't in NYC often it didn't make him immune. Based on the Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. (339 U.S. 306 (1950)) standard, the summons could be reasonably calculated to provide notice.